How pages are written
Editorial Policy
Dates, rates and codes on this site have to point at a source. A gap stays a gap.
From the desk. The latest editorial review was 23 October 2026. That is a review date, not a blanket observation date for every fact. Each store value, banner period, code report and roster snapshot retains its own observation date and source attribution. Older research, direct source checks and live-client tests are distinguished rather than presented as the same kind of verification.
Sources
First choice is stellasora.global news, Steam, Google Play and the App Store. Second is the Miraheze wiki, which is CC BY-SA 4.0, used for roster fields and system rules that the publisher does not publish as a guide. A single Japanese blog or retailer is labeled as one source. Tier letters are editorial and say so.
We do not publish APK links, account sales, or adult fan archives. We do not invent redeem codes. BOSSGIFT stays unverified until someone on this desk redeems it.
Corrections
Email [email protected] with the page URL and the source that disagrees. Confirmed corrections update the article’s review date and the affected fact’s source or observation note. Unchanged facts do not receive a new observation date solely because another paragraph changed. The about page describes who answers that mail.
Questions people ask
Why are some best builds missing?
Skill percentages were not on an official page. We do not fill them in.
Who do I tell about a wrong code?
[email protected]. Include the date you tried it.
Keep going
Editorially reviewed . Individual observation dates remain attached to time-sensitive facts.